The new Colorado River water year began Oct. 1 under a different operating framework, but Arizona’s biggest reductions will not take effect until the start of 2027.

KJZZ reported that the new federal rules begin changing how much water is released from Lake Powell to Lake Mead as the 2027 water year gets underway. Arizona’s own reductions, however, are tied to the calendar year and are expected to begin Jan. 1.

Arizona, California, and Nevada are still working to finalize a Lower Basin agreement that would determine how the reductions are divided among water users. KJZZ reported that Arizona’s top water negotiator, Tom Buschatzke, remains optimistic that the three states can complete the agreement before the end of the year.

Under the current framework, Arizona is expected to reduce its Colorado River use by 760,000 acre-feet in 2027, assuming the Lower Basin states finalize their proposed sharing agreement. ABC15 reported that the reduction would equal about 27% of Arizona’s normal Colorado River allocation.

The exact impact on individual cities and water providers is still being worked out. Phoenix officials told ABC15 that the city does not yet have a final number for how much of the statewide reduction will be reflected in its Central Arizona Project supply.

Arizona Water News reported that the Arizona Water Banking Authority is entering a new phase. Created in 1996, the Water Bank stored unused portions of Arizona’s Colorado River entitlement underground and accumulated long-term storage credits that can be recovered during shortages.

Through 2024, the Water Bank had accumulated more than 4.4 million acre-feet of long-term storage credits, including approximately 3.8 million acre-feet for Arizona uses and more than 600,000 acre-feet on behalf of Nevada.

The Water Bank also has responsibilities for firming certain Central Arizona Project municipal and industrial supplies and for helping meet Arizona’s Tribal firming obligations under the Arizona Water Settlements Act.

As Colorado River shortages deepen, those stored supplies are becoming more important. Instead of focusing primarily on putting additional water underground, the Water Bank is increasingly preparing for the recovery and use of water that has already been stored.

Cronkite News reported that some rural residents around Chino Valley are already dealing with wells that have gone dry, forcing them to rely on water-hauling businesses and private storage tanks.

The Prescott Active Management Area has been considered outside of safe yield for more than two decades, meaning groundwater is being removed faster than it is being replaced. Local officials told Cronkite News that continued growth and groundwater pumping have contributed to declining water levels.

The situation is separate from the Colorado River shortage, but the two issues are connected through Arizona’s broader water supply. As Colorado River deliveries decline, groundwater and stored underground supplies are expected to play a larger role for some communities.

KUNR reported on new research showing that wildfire is burning more land in watersheds that provide water to communities across the West. Researchers analyzed more than 17,000 watersheds and found that the average amount of land burned annually nearly doubled in watersheds serving more than 100,000 people.

Wildfire can temporarily increase runoff, but it can also worsen water quality by sending sediment, nutrients, and debris into rivers, reservoirs, and water treatment systems. Those effects can continue for years after a fire. (more…)

As September came to a close, Colorado River discussions shifted from announcing future cuts to a more difficult question: how will communities protect their water supplies as those reductions move closer.

In southwestern Arizona, Yuma officials are preparing for possible legal action on two separate water issues.

Arizona’s Family reported that the Yuma City Council unanimously authorized the city to prepare for legal action involving both Colorado River operating rules and a proposed transfer of Colorado River water from agricultural land in La Paz County to Queen Creek.

The proposed transfer involves water associated with GSC Farm. Yuma is joining Mohave and La Paz counties in challenging the transfer because local leaders are concerned about the precedent of moving water away from rural agricultural communities and toward growing metropolitan areas.

Yuma officials are also considering possible legal action involving the federal government’s new Colorado River operating guidelines. Mayor Doug Nicholls said Yuma wants to participate in addressing the river’s shortage but does not want agriculture to carry the entire burden. Yuma-area farms are an important source of winter produce for the United States.

At the same time, Arizona lawmakers are looking at another way to stretch the Colorado River supply.

KAWC reported on proposed federal legislation that would authorize restoration of the Yuma Desalting Plant, which was originally constructed to treat salty agricultural drainage water from the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District.

The proposed Colorado River Basin Water Security and Infrastructure Act would authorize $19 billion for water projects throughout the Basin, including $1 billion to restore the Yuma plant. Supporters say treating agricultural drainage water could reduce the amount of Colorado River water needed to meet downstream delivery requirements.

Arizona cities are also investing in their own water systems.

ABC15 reported that Phoenix is constructing a new 20-million-gallon reservoir at the Union Hills Water Treatment Plant. Historically, about 40% of Phoenix’s delivered water has come from the Colorado River, and city officials said the additional storage will give the system more flexibility as supplies become less certain.

Scottsdale, meanwhile, is considering additional review for new developments expected to use large quantities of water. Under the proposal, developments projected to use more than 100,000 gallons per day could face additional city approval requirements. The proposal had not yet been adopted when the story was published.

Private companies are also becoming more involved in Colorado River conservation.

KJZZ reported that Amazon pledged $20 million toward water-saving projects in Arizona and California. One proposed project would improve irrigation efficiency with an unnamed Tribal Nation in northern Arizona.

The investment is part of a larger effort to bring private funding into Colorado River conservation. KJZZ noted, however, that the scale of the river’s shortage is much larger than any single corporate investment. Major conservation programs involving farms, cities and infrastructure can require billions of dollars.

While states, cities and private companies look for ways to conserve or develop additional supplies, Lake Powell continues to show why those efforts are becoming urgent.

A Sept. 29 report said Lake Powell stood at about 3,518 feet in elevation, roughly 28 feet above minimum power pool, the level where Glen Canyon Dam can no longer effectively generate hydropower.

The reservoir had already reached a modern record low earlier in September. If Lake Powell falls below minimum power pool, water could still move through Glen Canyon Dam, but hydropower production would stop and dam operations would become more difficult.

The report also noted that federal efforts to protect Lake Powell can create consequences downstream. Reducing releases from Powell helps preserve its elevation but sends less water toward Lake Mead, demonstrating the difficult tradeoffs involved in managing the two reservoirs together.

Late September also marked the end of an era in Colorado River management. KGNU reported that the 2007 Interim Guidelines, which have governed operations during much of the river’s prolonged drought, were scheduled to expire Oct. 1. Years of negotiations among the seven Basin states had failed to produce a replacement agreement, leaving the federal government’s new management framework to guide the next phase of river operations. (more…)

Colorado is moving forward with a new voluntary conservation program as pressure grows for both the Upper and Lower basins to reduce demands on the Colorado River.

Colorado Newsline reported that the Colorado Water Conservation Board conditionally approved a “near-term contribution program” aimed at conserving 50,000 acre-feet of water during the 2027 water year. The program would use federal funding to compensate participants for conservation measures including temporary fallowing, deficit irrigation, and switching crops.

The program is voluntary and temporary, but farmers and Western Slope water managers have raised concerns about how it could affect agricultural communities. Some questioned whether conserved water can be tracked all the way downstream to Lake Powell and whether Colorado will receive credit for those reductions.

Colorado officials said they want participation from several water-use sectors rather than placing the responsibility primarily on agriculture. Water managers also emphasized that large-scale fallowing is not the only conservation option being considered.

The size of Colorado’s proposed conservation is relatively small compared with reductions facing the Lower Basin. Colorado Newsline reported that the program targets 50,000 acre-feet, while Arizona, California, and Nevada are expected to reduce their combined use by 1.25 million acre-feet in 2027.

At the same time, business groups from across all seven Colorado River Basin states are asking Congress for at least $2 billion in new federal funding for water projects.

KUNC reported that chambers of commerce and other business groups sent a letter to Congress seeking money for projects that could include repairing leaking municipal pipes, protecting watersheds from wildfire, and supporting programs that leave water in major reservoirs. (more…)

As Colorado River supplies remain under pressure, water agencies are investing in infrastructure to secure future deliveries while federal officials consider how declining reservoir levels affect hydropower and the river’s ecosystem.

One of the latest developments involves the Navajo Nation. Smart Water Magazine reported that the Bureau of Reclamation awarded an $81 million contract to Carstensen Contracting for construction of the final major segment of the Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project in New Mexico.

The project is intended to bring reliable drinking water to nearly 250,000 people on the Navajo Nation and surrounding communities, fulfilling a longstanding water rights settlement. The newly awarded contract covers a pipeline connecting the Frank Chee Willetto Reservoir, east of Shiprock, to the San Juan Lateral Water Treatment Plant.

The San Juan Lateral is now more than 75% complete, with initial deliveries targeted for late 2028 and full completion expected by the end of 2029. Once finished, the broader Navajo-Gallup project will include approximately 300 miles of pipeline, two water treatment plants, and 19 pumping plants, addressing a longstanding infrastructure challenge in communities where many households still rely on hauling water.

In Arizona, cities are also developing additional water supplies ahead of federal Colorado River reductions.

12News reported that Peoria is spending $104 million on a water farm west of Tonopah to strengthen its long-term water supply. The investment is part of the city’s preparation for reduced Colorado River deliveries and reflects how communities are looking beyond their existing allocations to secure water for future needs.

Meanwhile, conditions at the Basin’s two largest reservoirs continue to influence federal water management decisions.

KLAS reported that two-year projections show Lake Mead potentially declining by approximately 40 feet while Lake Powell rises by a similar amount. The projected changes highlight how operations at one reservoir are connected to conditions throughout the Colorado River system.

Circle of Blue also examined how low water levels at Lake Powell are affecting decisions at Glen Canyon Dam. According to the report, the Bureau of Reclamation decided against certain environmental water releases this year because of concerns about hydropower generation.

Those releases would have helped rebuild eroded sandbars in the Grand Canyon and provided colder water to limit the reproduction of invasive smallmouth bass, which threaten native fish such as the humpback chub.

The proposed environmental releases would change the timing or temperature of water passing through Glen Canyon Dam rather than the total amount released over the year. However, using the dam’s bypass tubes would reduce electricity generation.

Reclamation said it is considering other measures to protect native fish, including removing invasive species and studying infrastructure that could regulate downstream water temperatures.

Water quality is also receiving attention elsewhere in Arizona.

KTAR reported that the Upper Verde River is nearing designation as an Outstanding Arizona Water, the state’s highest level of surface water quality protection. The designation would help protect the river from new discharges that permanently degrade its water quality.

The Upper Verde supports drinking water supplies, recreation, and habitat for several threatened and endangered species.

Together, these developments show how water management across the Basin involves more than dividing available supplies. Tribal communities are working toward reliable water deliveries, Arizona cities are developing additional resources, federal officials are balancing hydropower and ecosystem needs, and state agencies are considering stronger protections for rivers.

What does this mean for CRIT?

The Navajo-Gallup pipeline development is especially relevant because it illustrates the difference between holding water rights and having the infrastructure necessary to use them.

The project is fulfilling a longstanding Tribal water rights settlement by creating the physical system needed to deliver water to Navajo communities. It provides another example of how Tribal water management involves legal rights, infrastructure, federal commitments, and long-term planning. (more…)

Two Tribal Nations in Arizona have taken new steps to protect their water resources and culturally significant landscapes as the Colorado River Basin continues to face declining supplies and growing development demands.

KJZZ reported that the Hualapai Tribal Council recently approved a moratorium opposing the development of hyperscale data centers on its nearly one-million-acre reservation. The Tribe shares a 108-mile boundary with the Colorado River and raised concerns about the potential effects of large-scale data centers on water supplies, land, and the environment.

Hyperscale data centers are large facilities that support cloud computing and artificial intelligence. Depending on their design, these facilities can require substantial water for cooling and electricity generation.

Hualapai Chairman Duane Clarke told KJZZ that protecting the Tribe’s air, land, and water remains a priority. The resolution also states that outside entities and private developers cannot use or compromise Tribal resources without the Tribe’s free, prior, and informed consent.

The decision comes as other Colorado River communities consider similar developments. KJZZ reported that residents in Bullhead City have raised concerns about potential data center projects, while a proposed facility near Page has drawn opposition from the Navajo Nation’s LeChee Chapter.

Another development involving the Navajo Nation highlights the cultural significance of the Colorado River.

Grand Canyon Trust reported that the Navajo Nation has formally designated the confluence of the Little Colorado River and Colorado River as a sacred site under Tribal law.

Known as Tooh Ahidiilíní, the confluence is located within the Grand Canyon and holds cultural and spiritual significance for the Navajo people and other Indigenous communities.

The designation follows more than a decade of efforts by Navajo families and the Save the Confluence coalition. Those efforts included opposition to the proposed Grand Canyon Escalade development, which would have constructed a tramway, hotels, and other commercial facilities near the confluence.

The new legislation recognizes the confluence, Little Colorado River Gorge, and surrounding cultural landscape as a sacred site protected under the Navajo Nation Cultural Resources Protection Act.

Meanwhile, uncertainty continues over how the federal government will manage the Colorado River.

ABC15 reported that Nevada’s lawsuit challenging the new federal operating guidelines could potentially delay their implementation. Nevada argues that the plan places too much of the shortage burden on the Lower Basin states without adequately considering economic and public health consequences.

The state is seeking to block the plan before Oct. 1. If a court grants that request, existing operating rules and reductions could remain in place while the lawsuit proceeds.

University of Nevada, Las Vegas professor Tom Romero told ABC15 that litigation could encourage the Basin states to resume negotiations, but a court decision would not resolve the river’s declining water supply.

A Reuters analysis published Sept. 14 helps explain that underlying challenge. The report found that the Colorado River’s average annual natural flow declined from approximately 14.9 million acre-feet during the 20th century to 12.3 million acre-feet between 2000 and 2025.

Reuters also reported that water consumption exceeded the river’s natural supply in 16 of the last 24 years analyzed, with reservoirs making up the difference.

Together, these developments show how Colorado River management involves more than dividing water between states. Tribal governments are exercising their authority to protect resources and culturally significant places, while federal officials and water users continue working through legal disputes and a river system that is producing less water than in previous decades.

What does this mean for CRIT?

The Hualapai and Navajo Nation developments connect directly to CRIT’s ongoing work involving water sovereignty, resource protection, and the cultural significance of the Colorado River.

The Hualapai decision demonstrates how a Tribal government can use its authority to address proposed development and potential impacts on its natural resources. The Navajo Nation’s designation of the Confluence also provides an example of Tribal law being used to formally recognize and protect a culturally significant river landscape. (more…)

Colorado River shortages are raising questions about more than how much water each state receives. For Tribal Nations along the river, decisions about reservoir operations can affect their ability to use water they already have legal rights to.

Nevada Public Radio, in a report carried by Utah Public Radio, highlighted the Fort Mojave Indian Tribe’s concerns as the federal government moves forward with new Colorado River operating guidelines. The Tribe holds approximately 133,000 acre-feet of water rights annually, with much of that water supporting agricultural operations that help fund housing, healthcare, education, and other Tribal services.

Fort Mojave Chairman Timothy Williams told the news outlet that changing river levels are already affecting the Tribe’s ability to deliver water to its farms. Last winter, water levels dropped so low that one of the Tribe’s pumping stations could not draw water for four months. Farm manager Andrew Harter said continued low-water conditions could limit what the Tribe can grow.

The report also addressed a longstanding concern among Tribal Nations: despite holding substantial water rights, Tribes do not have the same formal role as the seven Basin states in negotiating the river’s operating rules.

Jay Weiner, a water attorney for the Quechan Indian Tribe and a member of the Water and Tribes Initiative leadership team, said Tribal governments have historically been excluded from important water management decisions. With 30 federally recognized Tribes in the Colorado River Basin, the issue extends beyond any one reservation.

The impact of future shortages is also becoming a concern for Arizona agriculture.

Cronkite News reported that the federal reductions planned for 2027 and 2028 are not expected to immediately affect Yuma-area farmers, who hold senior Colorado River water rights. Much of the reduction will instead affect the Central Arizona Project, which delivers water to central and southern Arizona.

However, Arizona Farm Bureau President John Boelts said farmers remain concerned about what happens after the two-year operating period. Yuma-area farms supply approximately 90% of the leafy greens consumed in the United States and Canada between October and April.

Central Arizona farmers have already experienced significant reductions. Cronkite News reported that many farmers who previously relied on CAP agricultural water lost access around 2023, forcing some to leave fields fallow or turn to groundwater.

Meanwhile, Arizona’s growing technology industry is adding another dimension to the water discussion.

A separate Cronkite News report examined concerns about data centers, which require water for cooling and indirectly through electricity generation. Water experts interviewed by the outlet said data centers are not responsible for the current Colorado River shortage, although their continued growth could increase pressure on Arizona’s limited supplies.

Arizona State University water law professor Rhett Larson said data centers are growing rapidly, but determining their total water use remains difficult because facilities use different cooling systems and many are not required to publicly disclose their consumption.

Together, the Sept. 11 reports highlight several connected issues facing the Colorado River Basin: protecting access to Tribal water rights, preparing agriculture for future reductions, and understanding how new development adds to water demand.

What does this mean for CRIT?

The Fort Mojave reporting is particularly relevant to CRIT because both Tribes hold senior Colorado River rights and depend on the river for agriculture, economic activity, and cultural traditions.

Fort Mojave’s experience also illustrates the difference between possessing water rights and being able to physically use that water. Changes in river elevation can affect pumping infrastructure even when a Tribe’s legal allocation remains unchanged.

For CRIT, the reporting reinforces the significance of Tribal participation in Colorado River negotiations. Decisions about reservoir operations, conservation, and future shortages can have practical consequences for Tribal governments that rely directly on the river.

The agricultural reporting also connects to CRIT’s farming operations. Although senior rights place CRIT in a different position than many junior-priority users, the wider discussion about agricultural water use, conservation, and future shortages remains relevant to the Tribe’s economic interests.

Sources

Utah Public Radio / Nevada Public Radio: “Tribes depend on the Colorado River, but don’t have a formal say in managing it”

https://www.upr.org/politics/2026-09-11/native-tribes-colorado-river-negotiations-mojave

Cronkite News: “Colorado River cuts haven’t hit Arizona farmers yet, but that might be coming”

https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2026/09/10/water-cuts-arizona-farms/

Cronkite News: “Don’t blame data centers for Arizona’s Colorado River cuts, water experts say”

https://cronkitenews.azpbs.org/2026/09/11/data-centers-water-colorado-river/