October 19, 2026 3:50 pm
CRIT Nation, Parker, AZ
October 19, 2026 3:50 pm
CRIT Nation, Parker, AZ
According to the Arizona Capitol Times, cracks are beginning to show in Arizona’s previously unified position on Colorado River negotiations. Disagreements are emerging between state leaders and local communities over how water should be managed and protected as shortages worsen.
Some regions, particularly rural areas, are pushing back against policies they believe prioritize urban growth over local water security. These divisions highlight the increasing pressure Arizona faces as it works to defend its share of Colorado River water.
For CRIT, internal disagreements within Arizona matter because they can influence how the state approaches negotiations and allocation decisions, which ultimately affect Tribal water rights and the broader river system.
According to the Office of the Arizona Governor, Governor Katie Hobbs is expanding Arizona’s efforts to protect its Colorado River water by engaging national business leaders. The goal is to build broader support and strengthen Arizona’s position in ongoing negotiations over future river operations.
State officials are working to highlight the economic importance of Colorado River water and the potential impacts of shortages on industries and communities. This approach reflects how water issues are increasingly tied to economic and political strategy.
For CRIT, these efforts show how states are mobilizing additional influence in negotiations, which can shape how water is allocated and how Tribal interests are considered in future agreements.
According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, a recent heat wave is accelerating snowmelt across the Colorado River Basin, raising concerns about reduced spring runoff. Experts warn that early melting can lead to less water reaching major reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead.
The situation is being described as a “blaring alarm” for the river, as warming temperatures continue to impact how water is stored and delivered. Reduced runoff could worsen already declining reservoir levels.
For CRIT, early snowmelt and reduced runoff directly affect how much water flows through the Colorado River system, influencing future water availability and management decisions. (more…)
According to CBS 5 Arizona’s Family, Yuma officials are preparing for possible Colorado River water cuts as negotiations over future river operations continue. Yuma, a major agricultural hub, depends heavily on Colorado River water, and local leaders say reductions could impact farming, jobs, and the regional economy.
As federal and state officials work toward new post-2026 guidelines, communities like Yuma are closely watching how water shortages will be distributed across the basin. The uncertainty reflects ongoing challenges in reaching agreement among the seven basin states.
For CRIT, impacts to Yuma highlight how reductions in Colorado River water can affect agriculture and economies across the region, reinforcing the importance of protecting water rights and ensuring fair allocation decisions.
According to KJZZ, water conservation efforts in Arizona are becoming increasingly expensive, and officials are exploring whether large corporations could help cover some of the costs. Programs aimed at reducing water use, such as paying farmers or industries to conserve water, require significant funding.
State leaders and water managers are looking at partnerships with businesses to support conservation efforts as Colorado River supplies continue to decline. The goal is to find sustainable ways to reduce water use without placing the entire financial burden on taxpayers.
For CRIT, this reflects a broader shift in how water conservation is being funded and managed. As water becomes more limited, decisions about who pays for conservation efforts will play a key role in shaping long-term water policy.
According to the U.S. Department of the Interior, nearly $889 million is being invested in water infrastructure projects across the western United States. The funding will support efforts to improve water storage, conservation, and system efficiency as drought conditions continue.
The investment is part of a larger federal effort to strengthen water systems and address long-term shortages in the Colorado River Basin and other regions. Projects may include upgrades to canals, reservoirs, and water delivery systems. (more…)
By Ariana Romero CRIT Media
According to CBS 5 Arizona’s Family, Yuma officials are preparing for possible Colorado River water cuts as negotiations over future river operations continue. Yuma, a major agricultural hub, depends heavily on Colorado River water, and local leaders say reductions could impact farming, jobs, and the regional economy.
As federal and state officials work toward new post-2026 guidelines, communities like Yuma are closely watching how water shortages will be distributed across the basin. The uncertainty reflects ongoing challenges in reaching agreement among the seven basin states.
For CRIT, impacts to Yuma highlight how reductions in Colorado River water can affect agriculture and economies across the region, reinforcing the importance of protecting water rights and ensuring fair allocation decisions.
According to KJZZ, water conservation efforts in Arizona are becoming increasingly expensive, and officials are exploring whether large corporations could help cover some of the costs. Programs aimed at reducing water use, such as paying farmers or industries to conserve water, require significant funding.
State leaders and water managers are looking at partnerships with businesses to support conservation efforts as Colorado River supplies continue to decline. The goal is to find sustainable ways to reduce water use without placing the entire financial burden on taxpayers.
For CRIT, this reflects a broader shift in how water conservation is being funded and managed. As water becomes more limited, decisions about who pays for conservation efforts will play a key role in shaping long-term water policy.
According to the Daily Independent, Governor Katie Hobbs is working to involve national business leaders in Arizona’s efforts to address Colorado River water challenges. The state is seeking support from major industries to help advocate for Arizona’s position in ongoing river negotiations.
The move comes as Arizona faces potential reductions in its Colorado River allocation and increasing pressure to secure long-term water supplies. State officials are expanding their approach by bringing in economic stakeholders to strengthen their position.
For CRIT, this shows how water negotiations are expanding beyond government agencies to include business interests. These broader coalitions could influence how water decisions are made and how resources are prioritized across the basin. (more…)
By Ariana Romero CRIT Media
According to the Arizona Mirror, rural Arizona residents are pushing back against a proposed bill that would allow a hedge fund to transport and sell groundwater from rural areas to cities like Phoenix. Opponents argue the measure could drain local water supplies and remove control from the communities that depend on those resources.
The proposal highlights growing tensions between rural and urban water needs as Arizona faces increasing pressure from Colorado River shortages. As cities look for new water sources, rural communities are raising concerns about long-term sustainability and fairness.
For CRIT, this issue reflects a larger pattern across the Southwest, where water is becoming a highly valuable and contested resource. Decisions about who controls and benefits from water supplies are directly tied to protecting Tribal water rights and ensuring long-term access.
According to Signals AZ, decisions being made about the Colorado River’s future could have significant impacts on Yuma, one of Arizona’s most important agricultural regions. Yuma relies heavily on Colorado River water to support farming and local economies.
As negotiations continue over how to manage the river after 2026, potential reductions in water allocations could affect crop production and economic stability in the region. Officials are closely monitoring how federal plans may shape future water deliveries.
For CRIT, impacts to regions like Yuma highlight how interconnected the Colorado River system is. Changes in water distribution anywhere along the river can affect the overall balance of the system and influence decisions that impact Tribal communities downstream.
According to KJZZ, there is renewed discussion about restarting the dormant desalination plant in Yuma as a way to supplement Colorado River supplies. The plant, which treats water from Mexico, has long been considered a potential tool to help offset water shortages in the region.
Supporters say reviving the plant could help increase available water as Colorado River supplies continue to decline. However, questions remain about cost, environmental impacts, and long-term feasibility.
For CRIT, desalination represents one of several strategies being explored to reduce pressure on the Colorado River. These types of projects could play a role in shaping future water availability across the basin.
According to CBS 5 Arizona’s Family, treated seawater is being considered as a potential solution to help Arizona address deeper Colorado River water cuts. The idea involves desalinating ocean water and transporting it inland to supplement existing supplies. (more…)
By Ariana Romero CRIT Media
According to the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR), the February 2026 drought status report shows ongoing drought conditions across much of Arizona, with long-term dryness continuing to impact water supplies. While some areas have seen minor improvements, snowpack and precipitation levels remain below average in key regions that help feed rivers and groundwater systems.
These conditions are part of a broader trend across the Colorado River Basin, where reduced snowpack and warmer temperatures continue to limit water availability. Drought conditions not only affect surface water but also place increased pressure on groundwater resources as communities rely more heavily on alternative supplies.
For CRIT, ongoing drought conditions are critical because they directly impact the Colorado River system. Reduced water availability upstream can influence river flows, reservoir levels, and long-term water management decisions that affect Tribal water rights and future planning.
According to CBS 5 Arizona’s Family, two proposed Arizona bills would allow rural groundwater to be sold and transported to larger cities. Supporters say the legislation could help address water shortages in growing urban areas, while opponents argue it could drain rural water supplies and negatively impact local communities.
Residents in rural areas have raised concerns about losing control over their groundwater, especially as demand increases from cities facing Colorado River cutbacks. The issue highlights growing tension between rural and urban water needs in Arizona.
For CRIT, groundwater policy is closely tied to the broader conversation about water use and resource protection. As pressure on the Colorado River increases, decisions about groundwater transfers could reshape how water is distributed across the state and impact long-term water security.
According to the Payson Roundup, Arizona’s congressional delegation is متحد in opposing a federal plan that could reduce the state’s Colorado River water supply. Lawmakers argue the proposal would unfairly impact Arizona and are calling for a more balanced approach to managing shortages across the basin.
The opposition reflects ongoing disagreements between states and federal officials as new rules for managing the Colorado River after 2026 are developed. Arizona leaders say they are working to protect the state’s share of river water amid growing scarcity.
For CRIT, federal decisions about Colorado River allocations are especially important because they influence how water shortages are shared and how Tribal water rights are recognized within the system.
According to NOAA Drought.gov, snow drought conditions continue across much of the western United States, meaning there is less snowpack available to supply rivers like the Colorado River. Even when storms occur, warmer temperatures can cause snow to melt too early or fall as rain instead.
Snowpack acts as a natural storage system for water, slowly releasing runoff into rivers during the spring and summer. When snowpack is low, less water flows into reservoirs like Lake Powell and Lake Mead, which are critical to the Colorado River system.
For CRIT, snow drought conditions are a key concern because they directly affect how much water enters the Colorado River each year, influencing water availability for Tribal communities and long-term resource planning.
According to the Navajo Nation Office of the President and Vice President, President Buu Nygren is urging swift passage of a water rights settlement aimed at addressing long-standing water access challenges for the Navajo Nation. The settlement is intended to help secure water infrastructure and provide reliable access to water for communities that have faced shortages for generations.
Tribal leaders emphasize that water rights settlements are essential for ensuring that allocated water can actually be delivered and used, especially in areas lacking infrastructure.
For CRIT, this highlights the broader importance of Tribal water rights across the Colorado River Basin. Securing and developing water rights remains a key issue for Tribal Nations working to protect their resources and support their communities.
According to Tribal Business News, federal officials are warning of a funding gap as tribes support a proposed $5 billion Arizona water settlement. The settlement aims to resolve water rights issues and fund infrastructure projects, but concerns remain about whether sufficient federal funding will be available.
Tribal leaders continue to advocate for investment in water systems to ensure that water rights can be fully realized. Without funding, even legally secured water rights may remain difficult to access or use.
For CRIT, this reinforces the importance of both water rights and the infrastructure needed to support them. Funding decisions at the federal level can directly impact how Tribal Nations develop and protect their water resources.
By Ariana Romero CRIT Media
According to 12News (KPNX), the Central Arizona Project (CAP) is warning that Arizona could face up to $2.7 trillion in economic losses under a worst-case Colorado River management scenario.
CAP officials say severe water reductions could impact agriculture, housing development, and overall economic growth across the state. The Colorado River is a primary water source for Arizona, and any major cutbacks would ripple through multiple sectors.
For CRIT, this highlights how closely water is tied to economic stability. Decisions about Colorado River water are not just environmental, they directly affect jobs, infrastructure, and the long-term well-being of Tribal communities that depend on the river.
According to Newsweek, Lake Powell could see some of its lowest water levels in 25 years due to continued drought and low snowpack across the Colorado River Basin.
Forecasts show that inflows into the reservoir this year could be among the lowest on record, with only about 36% of average runoff expected. If water levels drop too low, it could threaten hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam and reduce the system’s ability to store and deliver water.
For CRIT, Lake Powell plays a major role in managing the Colorado River system. Declining reservoir levels can affect how water is released downstream, which impacts water availability for communities, agriculture, and Tribal Nations along the river.
According to Indianz.com, the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs is preparing to hold a hearing focused on Tribal water rights.
The hearing will address ongoing efforts to secure and protect water rights for Tribal Nations, many of which are still working to finalize settlements and access infrastructure needed to fully use their water allocations.
For CRIT, this is especially important because Tribal Nations hold some of the most senior water rights on the Colorado River. Federal discussions and decisions around these rights can influence how water is allocated, protected, and developed for Tribal communities now and in the future.
Sources
Indianz.com: https://indianz.com/News/2026/03/10/senate-committee-on-indian-affairs-sets-hearing-on-water-rights/
Article written by CRIT Media Reporter Ariana Romero
The young men of the Parker Broncs football team have shown strength, endurance, and determination throughout an incredible season. The Broncs remain undefeated at 8-0, but tonight, there is even more on the line.
Parker will take on Arizona Lutheran Academy in a battle for the 2A Metro 2 region title. Both teams enter the matchup undefeated in region play, with the Broncs looking to protect their perfect season in their final home game of the regular season.
Tonight will also mark Senior Night, giving the Parker community an opportunity to recognize the seniors who will take their home field one more time. After years of practices, games, and representing Parker High School, the seniors have a chance to close out their final home game with a region title on the line.
Kickoff is set for 7 p.m. at Joe Bush Stadium, and the Broncs are hoping to see the community pack the stands, get loud, and bring the energy.
Hard Work, Brotherhood, and One Goal
Being undefeated means a lot to this group of young men. The work behind their 8-0 record started long before Friday nights under the lights. Players trained through Parker’s extreme heat, spent hours lifting weights and conditioning, and continued working in the classroom to maintain the grades needed to compete.
During interviews with CRIT Media, one thing became clear: this is a TEAM.
When asked to describe their teammates and what has made this season special, the players gave many of the same answers: brotherhood, family, and best friends. Their similar responses reflected the bond they have built through long practices, workouts, wins, and challenges together.
That bond was just as noticeable while speaking with the team. The players were humble, polite, and proud to be Parker Broncs. Each showed respect for his teammates, coaches, and the game. While an undefeated record is something to celebrate, their focus remains on what is still ahead.
Their goal for the season is simple: keep winning and bring home the trophy. (more…)
Chairwoman Flores says CRIT And Tribal Governments must have a meaningful voice in decisions affecting the Colorado River and future generations
(SCOTTSDALE, Ariz.) Colorado River Indian Tribes leaders carried a message rooted in the Reservation’s past, present and future to the Ten Tribes Partnership meeting Wednesday: CRIT’s water rights must be protected, and tribal governments must have a meaningful voice in decisions shaping the Colorado River.
CRIT Chairwoman Amelia Flores chaired the October 14 meeting, joined on site by Tribal Councilmember Tommy Drennan. CRIT water attorney John Bezdek and other CRIT Tribal Council members participated remotely. CRIT’s presentation outlined the legal protections surrounding CRIT’s water rights and concerns about federal proposals that could threaten them.
With river levels declining and demand continuing to grow, Flores said tribal governments cannot remain on the sidelines as decisions are made about how the Colorado River is managed.
“We need to be included. We have the solutions,” Flores told representatives of the other tribes.
She said tribal leaders have spent years fighting for a meaningful role in Colorado River negotiations—decisions with direct consequences for CRIT lands, resources and future generations.
“I think we got a small corner of the room,” Flores said. “We’re allowed in, but yet we still are not at the table.”
Bezdek’s presentation focused on CRIT’s longstanding water rights, which were recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark Arizona v. California decision in 1963 and the subsequent 1964 decree.
Those rights date to the establishment of the Colorado River Indian Reservation in 1865, predating Arizona statehood and the creation of the Bureau of Reclamation.
“Because at CRIT, we are not a contractor, our water rights predate the Bureau of Reclamation,” Bezdek said.
He explained that CRIT’s water rights are not subject to evaporation and transportation losses that can apply to other Colorado River water users.
At the center of CRIT’s concern are Bureau of Reclamation proposals to spread shortages proportionally among water users, regardless of their established rights. Bezdek said those “pro rata” reductions could erode the priority system that protects senior water rights, including CRIT’s.
Bezdek said the Bureau of Reclamation has included the possibility of proportional reductions in two recent environmental reviews, despite objections from CRIT.
He argued that such reductions would violate the Supreme Court decree, undermine the Winters doctrine protecting federally reserved tribal water rights and raise constitutional concerns.
“It would basically just write it out of existence,” Bezdek said of the Winters doctrine, warning against abandoning the priority system during water shortages.
He said CRIT successfully pushed back against the latest proposal, resulting in federal acknowledgment that water shortages would be handled through voluntary agreements or, absent such agreements, the existing priority system.
Still, Bezdek said the repeated appearance of proportional reductions in federal planning documents is reason for concern.
“We continue to remain vigilant because we believe this will come back again,” Bezdek said.
He emphasized that the issue extends well beyond CRIT.
“This is not just a CRIT issue. This is not just a five tribes issue. This is every tribe,” he said.
For CRIT, protecting its water rights is only part of the challenge. The Tribes’ ability to put that water to use on the Reservation also depends on the aging Colorado River Indian Irrigation Project, which serves tribal agricultural lands in Arizona.
Authorized in 1867, it is the oldest Indian irrigation project in the United States. Bezdek said years of inadequate federal funding have left the system in serious disrepair, with irrigation efficiency estimated at approximately 56% to 58%, according to his presentation.
He explained that water lost through the inefficient system eventually returns to the Colorado River, benefiting other water users while limiting CRIT’s ability to fully use its entitlement.
“They were the beneficiaries of the Bureau of Indian Affairs chronically underfunding the project,” Bezdek said, referring to other water users.
CRIT has received a Bureau of Reclamation grant to study what it would take to modernize the irrigation system to 21st-century standards. (more…)
